| 1 |
On Sunday, 19 September 2021 19.15.50 CEST lumaro@×××××××.org wrote: |
| 2 |
> The worst thing for OpenRC |
| 3 |
> (native, by default and alternative to systemd) is to adopt binaries |
| 4 |
> from it |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
Hi, |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
Those binaries (I'm assuming you're talking about udev and tmpfilesd) |
| 9 |
don't really have any overlap with what OpenRC does (init/service |
| 10 |
management) and from what I can see it's the exact same situation for s6 |
| 11 |
so the same systemd code would still be required. I'm not saying that s6 |
| 12 |
support is a bad thing but the reason you state for adding it seems out |
| 13 |
of place. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
There's an existing s6 eclass that installs s6 services; as far as I can |
| 16 |
see, a total of 2 packages use it right now. My guess is that the reason |
| 17 |
why there's no s6 support across the board yet is lack of interest. You |
| 18 |
could either create a dedicated overlay or submit patches to the gentoo |
| 19 |
repository to directly add support to more packages. |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
-Marco |
Archives