Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Bob Sanders <rmsand@××××××××××.net>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] LTSP vs. Diskless Nodes
Date: Wed, 02 Nov 2005 03:02:57
Message-Id: 20051101185738.09057dbe@chi.speakeasy.net
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] LTSP vs. Diskless Nodes by Ryan Viljoen
1 On Tue, 1 Nov 2005 05:40:28 +0000
2 Ryan Viljoen <ravilj@×××××.com> wrote:
3
4 > What would you guys suggest in terms of specs for a server, serving
5 > say 50 odd thin clients?
6 >
7 >
8
9 Probably 2P Opteron with 2 GB to 8 GB main memory. Cpus around 2 GHz.
10 You'll have to calculate the memory needs of each client plus the server's running
11 overhead, and get enough memory to avoid swapping.
12
13 And most Opteron motherboards come with dual GigE ports, so it's possible to
14 split the clients across the GigE channels.
15
16 Of course you could go with a 4P Opteron motherboard and only populate the
17 first 2 cpus. Then if the load demands, add cpus and memory. The real downside
18 to this approach is it's really expensive. It might be cheaper to buy two separate 2P
19 servers and split the clients that way if need be, plus it gives a redundant system in case
20 one dies.
21
22 Why not 4P with dual cores? While they work, the need is i/o and memory bandwidth.
23 4 sockets does that while 2 sockets and 2 dual-cores cores is only half the bandwidth.
24
25 Bob
26 -
27 --
28 gentoo-user@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-user] LTSP vs. Diskless Nodes Sascha Hlusiak <saschahlusiak@×××××.de>
Re: [gentoo-user] LTSP vs. Diskless Nodes "A. Khattri" <ajai@××××.net>