1 |
Am 26.10.2014 um 22:16 schrieb Canek Peláez Valdés: |
2 |
> On Sun, Oct 26, 2014 at 3:01 PM, Volker Armin Hemmann |
3 |
> <volkerarmin@××××××××××.com> wrote: |
4 |
>> Am 26.10.2014 um 21:16 schrieb Canek Peláez Valdés: |
5 |
>>> On Sun, Oct 26, 2014 at 1:56 PM, Alec Ten Harmsel |
6 |
>>> <alec@××××××××××××××.com> wrote: |
7 |
>>>> On 10/26/2014 03:47 PM, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote: |
8 |
>>>>> Am 26.10.2014 um 20:09 schrieb Alexander Kapshuk: |
9 |
>>>>>> I've been using gentoo-sources for a while now. |
10 |
>>>>>> |
11 |
>>>>>> I remember reading on this list about some users using alternative |
12 |
>>>>>> kernels on their gentoo systems. My understanding is that amongst some |
13 |
>>>>>> of the other alternatives, besides the genkernel, which I'm not |
14 |
>>>>>> interested in using, are vanilla-sources available in the portage |
15 |
>>>>>> tree, and the sources available on kernel.org. |
16 |
>>>>>> I'd appreciate being given some pointers on how the folk here maintain |
17 |
>>>>>> their alternative kernels. |
18 |
>>>>>> |
19 |
>>>>>> Thanks. |
20 |
>>>>>> |
21 |
>>>>>> . |
22 |
>>>>>> |
23 |
>>>>> I let portage update the vanilla-sources and once in a while a build and |
24 |
>>>>> install a new kernel. At the moment I am on 3.12.23. Maybe I install |
25 |
>>>>> 3.12.30 tonight. If I find a good reason to do so. |
26 |
>>>>> |
27 |
>>>> What happens when you run `emerge --depclean`? |
28 |
>>>> |
29 |
>>>> I always un-keyword the exact version of vanilla-sources that I'm |
30 |
>>>> running since I update and depclean on a weekly basis. I'm not a huge |
31 |
>>>> fan of having a bunch of kernels under /usr/src/linux-* but only having |
32 |
>>>> a couple of them compiled, but to each his own I guess. |
33 |
>>> I have sys-kernel/vanilla-sources in package.keywords, unversioned. So |
34 |
>>> depclean cleans away the older versions, and I keep the latest one. |
35 |
>>> |
36 |
>>> I'm on 3.17.1 right now, but the moment 3.17.2 comes out I will switch |
37 |
>>> to it in all my machines: with kerninst is all of it mostly |
38 |
>>> automatized. |
39 |
>>> |
40 |
>>> And with systemd, rebooting to a new kernel takes just a few seconds ;) |
41 |
>>> |
42 |
>>> Regards. |
43 |
>> and without systemd, rebooting to a new kernel takes just a few seconds too. |
44 |
> Yeah Volker, whatever you say. You always make me laugh. |
45 |
|
46 |
Too bad, laughing seems to impair the rest of your higher functions. |
47 |
> |
48 |
>> Keep your stupid propaganda to yourself. Thank you. |
49 |
> You are free to stop reading me if you want. Me? I want to keep |
50 |
> reading you, you are hilarious, specially how do you think I will do |
51 |
> anything you'll say. Funny, funny guy. Keep it up. |
52 |
you are free to stop posting systemd propaganda wherever you go. |
53 |
|
54 |
>> As long as most time of a boot is spend by the bios, it really does not |
55 |
>> matter if the init system needs 1.5 seconds until X starts or 2.5 seconds. |
56 |
> Actually, with UEFI fastboot and Gummiboot, the kernel starts to boot |
57 |
> in just a couple of seconds. But, as with many other things you say, |
58 |
> is obvious you don't know what you are talking about, so believe |
59 |
> whatever you want. |
60 |
> |
61 |
> I'll just keep laughing at you. |
62 |
> |
63 |
> Regards. |
64 |
|
65 |
this was a nice thread, but you had to post some systemd propaganda. If |
66 |
you insist on acting like a spoilt little brat, I treat you like one. |
67 |
|
68 |
I have an UEFI system and my nice little asus board takes longer to go |
69 |
to grub, than it takes the kernel to go to init, and circa as long as |
70 |
init needs to go to kdm. So.. whatever you post, I regard as worthless |
71 |
blubbering of a systemd fanboi who can't hold back and has to infest |
72 |
every place he goes. |
73 |
|
74 |
If you would at least posting something useful. Nope. You don't. |