Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: eroen <eroen@××××××××××××.eu>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: [gentoo-user] Re: Portage performance dropped considerably
Date: Sun, 26 Jan 2014 15:32:56
Message-Id: 20140126163238.20bca0ce@falcon.eroen.eu
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] Portage performance dropped considerably by Greg Turner
1 On Sun, 26 Jan 2014 07:09:49 -0800, Greg Turner <gmt@×××××.us> wrote:
2 >It would help if there were some decent way to get some statistics
3 >about where portage is spending all its time (especially, I suspect,
4 >within the bash code, but the python level would also be interesting
5 >to analyse). Anyone know of a good way of doing that?
6
7 http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.devel/89518
8
9 Also, the attached patch to portage (works with 2.2.7 and 2.2.8 at
10 least, that too by TomWij) makes portage print out some more
11 information on what part of dependency resolution currently takes
12 place, without all the noise from --debug.
13
14 --
15 eroen

Attachments

File name MIME type
emerg.resolv.time_print.patch text/x-patch
signature.asc application/pgp-signature