Archives
Archives
| From: | Allan Spagnol Comar <allan.comar@×××××.com> |
|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-user@l.g.o |
| Subject: | [gentoo-user] Lilypond version |
| Date: | Tue, 21 Mar 2006 22:53:44 |
| Message-Id: | 1cc2dc830603211444o5479389erf05f0e49d62410fa@mail.gmail.com |
| 1 | Hi, I don't know where should I post this kind of message, but I need |
| 2 | to use lilypond as one of my working tools. I got stunned when I saw |
| 3 | today that lilypond version available at portage tree is 2.0.3 .... |
| 4 | the latest stable version is 2.6.5 and 2.0.3 is extreme old. |
| 5 | |
| 6 | Is there a reason that lilypond version is not up to date .... and |
| 7 | should I build myself ( without portage ) if I want to used it ? |
| 8 | |
| 9 | -- |
| 10 | An application asked: |
| 11 | "Requeires Windows 9x, NT4 or better", |
| 12 | so I´ve installed Linux |
| 13 | |
| 14 | -- |
| 15 | gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-user] Lilypond version | Dave Moore <dave.j.moore@×××××.com> |
| Re: [gentoo-user] Lilypond version | Bo Andresen <bo.andresen@×××××.com> |
| Re: [gentoo-user] Lilypond version | Holly Bostick <motub@××××××.nl> |
| [gentoo-user] Re: Lilypond version | Mick <michaelkintzios@××××××××.uk> |
| Re: [gentoo-user] Lilypond version | Nick Rout <nick@×××××××.nz> |