1 |
On Sat, May 17, 2014 at 9:37 PM, Greg Turner <gmt@×××××.us> wrote: |
2 |
> |
3 |
> |
4 |
> On Sat, May 17, 2014 at 4:21 AM, David Haller <gentoo@×××××××.de> wrote: |
5 |
>> |
6 |
>> Oh, and _very_ importantly: get a _GOOD_ matt monitor if you haven't |
7 |
>> yet. |
8 |
> |
9 |
> |
10 |
> Apologies, David, for hijacking your really good question-thread, which I'm also very eager to hear people's answers to. But, this reminds me of something I've been pondering lately... |
11 |
> |
12 |
> I think maybe refresh-rate discrepancies are subtly evil in multi-monitor setups. When I look at my 59.9 kHz apple cinema next to my 60 kHz POS Dell throwaway monitor, something spooky clearly happens in my brain -- if I get up close and look carefully, the pixels seem to rather dramatically "swim" near the bezels between the two monitors, in a way that reminds me of a migraine prodrome (perhaps because, to some degree, that's exactly what I'm inducing in my brain, by exposing it to high-frequency polyharmonic interference (presumably, there's a >0.5 MHz harmonic between those two displays, no wonder my brain doesn't like it!). |
13 |
|
14 |
From your description I am suspecting that your problem is not due to |
15 |
59.9 Hz vs 60.0 Hz but rather poorly tuned analog to digital |
16 |
conversions in one or both of the monitors, you could use a |
17 |
high-frequency test pattern such as [1] and press your monitors' |
18 |
"Auto" button (or select Auto configuration from some menu). The high |
19 |
frequency pattern will help the monitor during the auto configuration |
20 |
and let it tune the phase of the analog signal more precisely. This is |
21 |
if you are using a VGA cable and not something digital, such as DVI or |
22 |
HDMI. If you are having the same problems with digital signalling you |
23 |
probably have a bad cable. |
24 |
|
25 |
> |
26 |
> In practice, I don't seem to have had any huge problem from this (and I'm going to get rid of that crappy Dell soon, anyhow) but I have heard reports from people claiming this type of thing caused eye fatigue and headaches. |
27 |
> |
28 |
> My semi-baseless theory is that, so long as the remainders of the greatest common multiples of your various monitors' refresh-rates form nice clean ratios like 1:2, 2:3, etc, you probably won't fry your wetware input circuitry looking at them. |
29 |
> |
30 |
> However, if, as above, there are ugly harmonics, I suspect it might be pretty bad for some people. If, like me, you're too cheap for the 100% solution of buying identical monitors, maybe just try to ensure everything you buy supports standard 60kHz standard modes, or even go read the 1990's-era ModeLine authoring FAQ's and attempt to actually understand the problem and fix it, if you're feeling ambitious :) |
31 |
> |
32 |
> Anyhow... we now return to our regularly schedule programming... |
33 |
> |
34 |
> -gmt |
35 |
|
36 |
[1]: http://pixelmappat.nu/ |
37 |
|
38 |
Best regards, |
39 |
Joakim |