1 |
On Thursday 10 May 2012 00:58:47 Dale wrote: |
2 |
> Mark Knecht wrote: |
3 |
> > On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 3:24 PM, Dale <rdalek1967@×××××.com> wrote: |
4 |
> >> Alan McKinnon wrote: |
5 |
> > <SNIP> |
6 |
> > |
7 |
> >>> My thoughts these days is that nobody really makes a bad drive anymore. |
8 |
> >>> Like cars[1], they're all good and do what it says on the box. Same |
9 |
> >>> with bikes[2]. |
10 |
> >>> |
11 |
> >>> A manufacturer may have some bad luck and a product range is less than |
12 |
> >>> perfect, but even that is quite rare and most stuff ups can be fixed |
13 |
> >>> with new firmware. So it's all good. |
14 |
> >> |
15 |
> >> That's my thoughts too. It doesn't matter what brand you go with, they |
16 |
> >> all have some sort of failure at some point. They are not built to last |
17 |
> >> forever and there is always the random failure, even when a week old. |
18 |
> >> It's usually the loss of important data and not having a backup that |
19 |
> >> makes it sooooo bad. I'm not real picky on brand as long as it is a |
20 |
> >> company I have heard of. |
21 |
> > |
22 |
> > One thing to keep in mind is statistics. For a single drive by itself |
23 |
> > it hardly matters anymore what you buy. You cannot predict the |
24 |
> > failure. However if you buy multiple identical drives at the same time |
25 |
> > then most likely you will either get all good drives or (possibly) a |
26 |
> > bunch of drives that suffer from similar defects and all start failing |
27 |
> > at the same point in their life cycle. For RAID arrays it's |
28 |
> > measurably best to buy drives that come from different manufacturing |
29 |
> > lots, better from different factories, and maybe even from different |
30 |
> > companies. Then, if a drive fails, assuming the failure is really the |
31 |
> > fault of the drive and not some local issue like power sources or ESD |
32 |
> > events, etc., it's less likely other drives in the box will fail at |
33 |
> > the same time. |
34 |
> > |
35 |
> > Cheers, |
36 |
> > Mark |
37 |
> |
38 |
> You make a good point too. I had a headlight to go out on my car once |
39 |
> long ago. I, not thinking, replaced them both since the new ones were |
40 |
> brighter. Guess what, when one of the bulbs blew out, the other was out |
41 |
> VERY soon after. Now, I replace them but NOT at the same time. Keep in |
42 |
> mind, just like a hard drive, when one headlight is on, so is the other |
43 |
> one. When we turn our computers on, all the drives spin up together so |
44 |
> they are basically all getting the same wear and tear effect. |
45 |
|
46 |
Unless you're driving something out of the 60's before halogen bulbs came out, |
47 |
you didn't by any chance touched them with your greasy fingers - did you? |
48 |
Because that's a promoter of early failure (unequal temperature tension caused |
49 |
by impurities on the glass). |
50 |
|
51 |
It's better to use a clean tissue or the foam wrapper they are packed in and |
52 |
take care not to touch them with your fingers at all. Should you |
53 |
inadvertently do so, then you'll need to clean them with meths or similar |
54 |
degreaser. |
55 |
-- |
56 |
Regards, |
57 |
Mick |