1 |
On Tuesday 23 November 2010 23:54:19 Alan McKinnon wrote: |
2 |
|
3 |
> 16 for SCSI is plenty in real life, |
4 |
|
5 |
Well, you'd think so, but in my meddling days I hit my head on the |
6 |
ceiling. My other box, with whatever version of IDE was current then, |
7 |
had three more. |
8 |
|
9 |
> and it's a hardware limitation not a software one so the driver can't |
10 |
> be updated for this. |
11 |
|
12 |
That's what I was asking about. What hardware limit is that? |
13 |
|
14 |
> 24 drive letters has *nothing* to do with partition number limits. |
15 |
> They are not even vaguely related. |
16 |
|
17 |
Just, if you happened to have 24 partitions, Windows would be ready to |
18 |
label them all. Foresight? Windows? Must be a mirage. |
19 |
|
20 |
-- |
21 |
Rgds |
22 |
Peter. Linux Counter 5290, 1994-04-23. |