Archives
Archives
| From: | "»Q«" <boxcars@×××.net> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-user@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | [gentoo-user] Re: nvidia warning comes a tad late | ||
| Date: | Fri, 02 Jan 2009 11:17:26 | ||
| Message-Id: | 20090101163953.15a9ac8f@prezmyra.remarqs.net | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-user] Re: nvidia warning comes a tad late by Neil Bothwick |
||
| 1 | In <20090101213152.77d30b94@krikkit>, |
| 2 | Neil Bothwick <neil@××××××××××.uk> wrote: |
| 3 | |
| 4 | > On Thu, 1 Jan 2009 14:14:16 -0600, »Q« wrote: |
| 5 | > |
| 6 | > > I guess I'm in the camp that thinks the administrator should know |
| 7 | > > what modules are needed for the hardware, and portage should keep |
| 8 | > > working as it does now. |
| 9 | > |
| 10 | > Then why the test and warning? |
| 11 | |
| 12 | I haven't advocated a test and warning. But why not? |
| 13 | |
| 14 | -- |
| 15 | »Q« |
| 16 | Kleeneness is next to Gödelness. |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-user] Re: nvidia warning comes a tad late | Neil Bothwick <neil@××××××××××.uk> |
| Re: [gentoo-user] Re: nvidia warning comes a tad late | Dirk Heinrichs <dirk.heinrichs@××××××.de> |