Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Mick <michaelkintzios@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] NTP or chrony?
Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2006 21:34:55
Message-Id: 200609222229.09372.michaelkintzios@gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] NTP or chrony? by Neil Bothwick
1 On Friday 22 September 2006 14:48, Neil Bothwick wrote:
2 > On Fri, 22 Sep 2006 14:26:20 +0100, Mick wrote:
3 > > For a laptop . . .
4 > >
5 > > What do/would you use and why?
6 >
7 > ntp assumes a permanent connection, so chrony is probably a better
8 > solution. I thin it was originally intended for dialup use, but is well
9 > suited to a laptop with an intermittent Internet connection.
10 >
11 > I should use it on mine, but never bothered to set it up, I still use
12 > rdate run from the network postup() script.
13
14 Hmm, for some reason my ISP's ntp server does not work with my Gentoo (it
15 works with WinXP):
16 ===================================================
17 22:23:52.518518 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 64, id 0, offset 0, flags [DF], proto: UDP
18 (17), length: 28) 192.168.0.5.32788 > ntp.metronet.co.uk.time: UDP, length 0
19 22:23:52.518830 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 64, id 38401, offset 0, flags [DF], proto:
20 UDP (17), length: 72) 192.168.0.5.32789 > router.domain: 65070+[|domain]
21 22:23:52.533571 IP (tos 0xa0, ttl 60, id 49836, offset 0, flags [none],
22 proto: ICMP (1), length: 56) ntp.metronet.co.uk > 192.168.0.5: ICMP
23 ntp.metronet.co.uk udp port time unreachable, length 36
24 IP (tos 0x40, ttl 60, id 0, offset 0, flags [DF], proto: UDP (17),
25 length: 28) 192.168.0.5.32788 > ntp.metronet.co.uk.time: [|udp]
26 ===================================================
27
28 What's this "port time unreachable" message - the rdate command times out of
29 course.
30 --
31 Regards,
32 Mick

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-user] NTP or chrony? Hans-Werner Hilse <hilse@×××.de>