| 1 |
On Sun, May 14, 2017 at 9:31 AM, Kai Krakow <hurikhan77@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 2 |
> Am Sun, 14 May 2017 08:32:46 +0100 |
| 3 |
> schrieb Jorge Almeida <jjalmeida@×××××.com>: |
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
>> >> In case someone is using kernel 4.11: I tried it and everything |
| 6 |
>> >> seems fine, except that the linux logo on the boot screen (i.e. |
| 7 |
>> >> tty1) is gone. It was there before (with 4.10.9), and I used make |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
>> $ zgrep -i logo /proc/config.gz |
| 11 |
>> CONFIG_LOGO=y |
| 12 |
>> # CONFIG_LOGO_LINUX_MONO is not set |
| 13 |
>> # CONFIG_LOGO_LINUX_VGA16 is not set |
| 14 |
>> CONFIG_LOGO_LINUX_CLUT224=y |
| 15 |
>> $ |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
> Use |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
> # vimdiff oldlinux/.config newlinux/.config |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
Done that. There are only a few differences and none seems relevant. |
| 23 |
> |
| 24 |
> I think there were changes to the framebuffer devices. You may need to |
| 25 |
> switch to a different one. |
| 26 |
> |
| 27 |
I use the Intel integrated graphics, I didn't do anything special |
| 28 |
about framebuffer. The current one works smoothly regarding KMS and |
| 29 |
I'm happy with it (I do use VTs). |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
$ cat /proc/fb |
| 32 |
0 inteldrmfb |
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
|
| 35 |
I suppose it's goodbye to Tux, for now. I was hoping someone else |
| 36 |
would be using the same kernel... |
| 37 |
|
| 38 |
Thanks |
| 39 |
|
| 40 |
Jorge |
Archives