| 1 |
On 2020-04-22 13:28, Ashley Dixon wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> This is the ONE situation under which I would recommend GNOME, as it |
| 4 |
> is generally the best with built-in accessibility features [3]. |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
I don't know about that. Mouse Keys was broken for at least 2 Fedora |
| 7 |
releases (it would do the moves but not the clicks) and my bug about |
| 8 |
that was handled in the typical GNOME/Fedora fashion, ie. ignored until |
| 9 |
they could close it with reference to the next version. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
> lot of the more niche W.M.s (such as i3) require an incredible amount |
| 12 |
> of tinkering (and often changes to the code-base) to introduce any |
| 13 |
> sort of considering for accessibility. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
Maybe wrt visual handicaps you are right, but wrt keyboard access to |
| 16 |
everything that "normal" users do with the mouse, I violently disagree. |
| 17 |
I use bspwm now and it is the _very best_ interface I ever had, freeing |
| 18 |
me from the authoritarian rodent for hours at a time. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
-- |
| 21 |
Ian |
Archives