1 |
Squid with squidguard or dansguardian should filter out most of the 'bad stuff'. |
2 |
|
3 |
-Chris |
4 |
|
5 |
On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 11:34 AM, Mark Knecht <markknecht@×××××.com> wrote: |
6 |
> On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 8:22 AM, <emailjp79@×××.de> wrote: |
7 |
>> Michael [19.Nov.2008 16:07]: |
8 |
>> |
9 |
>>> On 10:05 Wed 19 Nov , Qian Qiao wrote: |
10 |
>>> ... |
11 |
>>>> |
12 |
>>>> In that case, isn't putting |
13 |
>>>> |
14 |
>>>> 127.0.0.1 ADDRESSES_TO_BE_BLOCKED |
15 |
>>>> |
16 |
>>>> into /etc/hosts easier? |
17 |
>>>> |
18 |
>>>> Or just set up a proxy. |
19 |
>>> |
20 |
>>> No, perhaps not, considering the fact that there are so many sites with |
21 |
>>> pron. Maintaining such a massive hosts file is a disaster and worse still |
22 |
>>> the solution is not fullproof. But then, FWIW such problems seldom have |
23 |
>>> foolproof solutions. |
24 |
>> |
25 |
>> Well, at least there is "mvps" [1] with a nice host-file, blocking |
26 |
>> mostly ads, banners etc., which I use myself without much trouble. |
27 |
>> While searching for a list of porn-sites to add to that list, I stumbled |
28 |
>> upon BadHosts [2], which includes several hosts-files, one of them |
29 |
>> entirely for porn-sites. |
30 |
>> |
31 |
>> The sites listed there might get you started, but as noted by Qian Qiao |
32 |
>> before, that list will never be complete or up-to-date. Besides, using |
33 |
>> an anonymizer to reach one of those sites will get you there anyway. You |
34 |
>> would have to block those, too. |
35 |
>> |
36 |
>> My opinion: If children are to be "protected" from that kind of content, |
37 |
>> seting up a public computer in a livingroom might be a better way (in |
38 |
>> conjunction with a host-file maybe for those nasty ads). But as soon as |
39 |
>> one starts blocking sites, the question will be where to stop. |
40 |
>> |
41 |
>> |
42 |
>> JP |
43 |
> |
44 |
> Thanks to all that have answered. I appreciate the responses greatly. |
45 |
> |
46 |
> Indeed the question was based around what to do with a kid that's not |
47 |
> using his computer time appropriately. It has nothing to do with |
48 |
> 'protecting' him via censoring or anything like that. It was more a |
49 |
> matter of should he be playing Flash games or playing online videos of |
50 |
> Star Craft games when he has homework to be doing. After thinking |
51 |
> about it the decision in the end was to do nothing technical. Nothing |
52 |
> technical is going to fix this problem other than him growing up a |
53 |
> bit. |
54 |
> |
55 |
> Thanks again, |
56 |
> Mark |
57 |
> |
58 |
> |