1 |
Hi there, |
2 |
|
3 |
I emerged SpamAssasin on a mailserver the other day, added the |
4 |
appropriate line to /etc/postfix/master.cf and it all seems to be |
5 |
working ok. But it doesn't seem to be very accurate in the default |
6 |
configuration - I have a mailbox with about 4,000 messages, |
7 |
approximately 98% of which are spam and it gets only about 1/3 of |
8 |
them. The statement in `perldoc Mail::SpamAssassin::Conf`that "5.0 is |
9 |
the default setting, is quite aggressive" does not seem true here. |
10 |
|
11 |
The installation is for a small site with about 5 users who won't be |
12 |
capable of much sophistication when it comes to training spam & ham - |
13 |
it's a shame that something magical can't be done involving right- |
14 |
clicks in Outlook - so I'd just like a cheap & cheerful way to |
15 |
improve accuracy. |
16 |
|
17 |
I'd be very happy with a 95% success rate on spam detection, but |
18 |
obviously false positives are a Bad Thing. |
19 |
|
20 |
I read something about Vipul's Razor so emerged it before emerging |
21 |
SpamAssasin - I think this means that SA is able to take advantage of |
22 |
it - but haven't looked yet into setting it up. Is it any good? I |
23 |
read stuff about training Razor & returning feedback to the network, |
24 |
but that's really not an option here - is it possible just to use |
25 |
Razor as a "leeching" client? |
26 |
|
27 |
Thanks in advance for any suggestions, |
28 |
|
29 |
Stroller. |
30 |
|
31 |
-- |
32 |
gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |