| 1 |
On Monday, August 29, 2016 05:10:37 PM Daniel Frey wrote: |
| 2 |
> On 08/29/2016 03:39 PM, Michael Orlitzky wrote: |
| 3 |
> > On 08/29/2016 06:10 PM, Alan McKinnon wrote: |
| 4 |
> >> What replaces it's functionality, or what is now in the codebase that |
| 5 |
> >> guarantees the problems python-updater fixed can't happen anymore? |
| 6 |
> > |
| 7 |
> > *shrug* |
| 8 |
> > |
| 9 |
> > mgorny says: |
| 10 |
> > It's obsolete for a long time (pretty much since PYTHON_TARGETS |
| 11 |
> > become widespread), full of bugs and pretty much useless these days. |
| 12 |
> > It will be masked for removal soon. However, we are giving people a |
| 13 |
> > few more weeks to get it cleaned out of their systems to avoid any |
| 14 |
> > potential issues. |
| 15 |
> > |
| 16 |
> > https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=590120 |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> Ah, that's why I didn't find a bug, it was closed already. |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
> Dan |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
For something like this, a news-item would have been more useful than a |
| 23 |
message in a bug-report. |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
-- |
| 26 |
Joost |
Archives