1 |
On Monday, 24 October 2022 14:49:46 BST Grant Edwards wrote: |
2 |
> On 2022-10-23, Dale <rdalek1967@×××××.com> wrote: |
3 |
> > That is true on Linux. Most linux software could care less what the |
4 |
> > extension is or if it even has one. Heck, you could likely change a |
5 |
> > .mp4 to .txt and it would open with a video player just by clicking on |
6 |
> > it. Thing is, if I share a file with someone who uses windoze, I'm not |
7 |
> > sure if it would work the same way. A wrong extension could cause |
8 |
> > problems, either not opening at all or crashing something. It's |
9 |
> > windoze, one can't expect much. ROFL |
10 |
> |
11 |
> A friend of mine once spent days trying to re-encode a video file into |
12 |
> a format that could be handled by a particular windows app. No matter |
13 |
> what codecs/parameters he tried, the app couldn't open the file. He |
14 |
> finally figured out that the app in question had hard requirements for |
15 |
> the filename suffix, and they chose a somewhat non-nstandard extension |
16 |
> for that container format. |
17 |
> |
18 |
> It turned out that any of the codec/parameter combinations would have |
19 |
> been fine, it was just the filename that was causing the problem. |
20 |
|
21 |
So the hubris of those two college dropouts still haunts the Windows world. |
22 |
What a legacy. |
23 |
|
24 |
-- |
25 |
Regards, |
26 |
Peter. |