1 |
On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 1:22 PM, Volker Armin Hemmann |
2 |
<volkerarmin@××××××××××.com> wrote: |
3 |
> Am Dienstag 27 September 2011, 13:07:02 schrieb Michael Mol: |
4 |
>> Except they have drivers which are buggy and require backported fixes. |
5 |
> |
6 |
> and that is the reason stable series exist. They are stable and they backport |
7 |
> fixes. Exclusively. |
8 |
|
9 |
I hadn't even heard of these until Mark's email 20 minutes ago. It's |
10 |
useful information. You might have saved us some arguing if you'd |
11 |
presented it more specific and in an explanatory fashion, rather than |
12 |
dropping a noun and assuming it was specifically known. I assumed you |
13 |
meant the kernels maintained by distributions. Obviously, I was wrong, |
14 |
but Mark's email cleared that up for me. |
15 |
|
16 |
> |
17 |
>> The reasons might be that they're using an old software |
18 |
>> package which was abandoned, and taking ownership of the code isn't |
19 |
>> always sane. I was actually approached by someone in my area a couple |
20 |
>> weeks ago who was in just this kind of scenario. |
21 |
> |
22 |
> and if the system just works - why touch it at all? |
23 |
|
24 |
Because, in this case, the hardware, which is unreplaceable, went tits |
25 |
up. Meaning it no longer works. It can't be replaced, and they're SOL |
26 |
until they get the software ported forward. Their remaining hardware |
27 |
of the same vintage had already died on them, and they didn't have any |
28 |
migration path or hedge set up. |
29 |
|
30 |
Other reasons--and this is why I *loathe* unnuanced "if it works, |
31 |
don't touch it" mentalities--include security updates and migration |
32 |
difficulty in the event of *necessity* of upgrades. |
33 |
|
34 |
I know someone who's running Ubuntu 7.10 on a server that accepts |
35 |
incoming, public connections--because they got it working, and didn't |
36 |
even want to update to the Ubuntu 8.04 LTS, because of a "if it just |
37 |
works, why touch it at all?" mentality. Eventually, they _will_ be |
38 |
hacked as a consequence, even if it's just from someone scanning the |
39 |
public IPv4 space with tools looking for vulnerable versions of |
40 |
software. |
41 |
|
42 |
The other general class of cases is something Gentoo users should be |
43 |
able to understand in the abstract; the longer you go without |
44 |
updating, the more difficult and expensive (in terms of time fixing |
45 |
incompatibilities from un{tested,supported} version jumps, at the very |
46 |
least) it becomes when you no longer have a choice. |
47 |
|
48 |
-- |
49 |
:wq |