Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Petr Kocmid <Petr.Kocmid@××××××××××××××××.org>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] portage 2.1 uses LINGUAS, why?
Date: Wed, 31 May 2006 15:29:55
Message-Id: 200605311713.51964.Petr.Kocmid@project-bhairava.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] portage 2.1 uses LINGUAS, why? by Raymond Lewis Rebbeck
1 Anyway, I do not see a localisation of a fundamental system tool to be a good
2 idea. That's my point. Localisations are never up to date. Some day, it will
3 break something and I would prefer future portage will NOT accept LINGUAS.
4 Never.
5
6 On Wednesday 31 May 2006 15:44, Raymond Lewis Rebbeck wrote:
7 > Hates Polish? I think including (what I assume is) a Polish translations of
8 > portage would indicate that it loves polish :p
9 >
10 > If you don't want polish then don't put 'pl' in your LINGUAS variable, if
11 > you want to be able to set 'cs' for portage than make a translation.
12 >
13 > On Wednesday, 31 May 2006 23:04, Petr Kocmid wrote:
14 > > [ebuild U ] sys-apps/portage-2.1_rc3-r2 [2.1_rc3-r1] USE="doc -build"
15 > > LINGUAS="-pl" 3 kB
16 > >
17 > > Any good explanation why portage hates polish? I never used pl in
18 > > LINGUAS, have LINGUAS="cs" in make.conf all the time. And It's not just
19 > > rc3-r2, I already noticed this before. I would rather expect portage to
20 > > be linguas neutral.
21 > >
22 > > Petr
23 > --
24 > Raymond Lewis Rebbeck
25
26 --
27
28 Petr
29 --
30 gentoo-user@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-user] portage 2.1 uses LINGUAS, why? Daniel da Veiga <danieldaveiga@×××××.com>
[gentoo-user] Re: portage 2.1 uses LINGUAS, why? Harm Geerts <harmgeerts@××××.nl>