1 |
Anyway, I do not see a localisation of a fundamental system tool to be a good |
2 |
idea. That's my point. Localisations are never up to date. Some day, it will |
3 |
break something and I would prefer future portage will NOT accept LINGUAS. |
4 |
Never. |
5 |
|
6 |
On Wednesday 31 May 2006 15:44, Raymond Lewis Rebbeck wrote: |
7 |
> Hates Polish? I think including (what I assume is) a Polish translations of |
8 |
> portage would indicate that it loves polish :p |
9 |
> |
10 |
> If you don't want polish then don't put 'pl' in your LINGUAS variable, if |
11 |
> you want to be able to set 'cs' for portage than make a translation. |
12 |
> |
13 |
> On Wednesday, 31 May 2006 23:04, Petr Kocmid wrote: |
14 |
> > [ebuild U ] sys-apps/portage-2.1_rc3-r2 [2.1_rc3-r1] USE="doc -build" |
15 |
> > LINGUAS="-pl" 3 kB |
16 |
> > |
17 |
> > Any good explanation why portage hates polish? I never used pl in |
18 |
> > LINGUAS, have LINGUAS="cs" in make.conf all the time. And It's not just |
19 |
> > rc3-r2, I already noticed this before. I would rather expect portage to |
20 |
> > be linguas neutral. |
21 |
> > |
22 |
> > Petr |
23 |
> -- |
24 |
> Raymond Lewis Rebbeck |
25 |
|
26 |
-- |
27 |
|
28 |
Petr |
29 |
-- |
30 |
gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |