1 |
Frank Steinmetzger wrote: |
2 |
> On Mon, Apr 22, 2019 at 09:54:21AM -0500, Dale wrote: |
3 |
> |
4 |
>> The biggest reason I wanted laser is the cost of ink. The second |
5 |
>> reason, longevity of the ink once it is on paper. From my |
6 |
>> understanding, once the toner is set on the paper, water won't make it |
7 |
>> come off like it does on a lot of inkjets, I think a few inkjets have |
8 |
>> special ink that doesn't but never seen one. |
9 |
> Well, I read a short while ago in a printer review of a computer magazine, |
10 |
> that ink may actually be better in the long-term, because the ink is infused |
11 |
> into the paper matrix (as a character on Star Trek would say). Whereas laser |
12 |
> toner is only put on the surface on the paper an could be scratched off |
13 |
> mechanically. You would need lasting pigments of course, not of the kind |
14 |
> that fades with time or exposure to light. |
15 |
> |
16 |
> FWIW, I have an HP LaserJet 1000, bought around 2004. It has been acting up |
17 |
> lately, not always getting recognised on USB. The data cable is actually a |
18 |
> centronics one with built-in USB convertor. And I don’t really like hplip, |
19 |
> b/c it’s an extra piece of software that needs to run and it ALWAYS wants to |
20 |
> re-download the binary firmware blob from the internet whenever I connect |
21 |
> the printer. Otherwise it wouldn’t print. Back when foo2zjs was still a |
22 |
> common Gentoo way of printing, this was never an issue. |
23 |
> |
24 |
> OTOH, the printer is still on the cartridge it originally came with, albeit |
25 |
> almost empty now. Probably, back then, those cartridges weren’t as empty as |
26 |
> today’s starter cartridges. What’s the deal with this, anyway. |
27 |
> |
28 |
> FWIF2, even though the die is cast and the printer for this thread is |
29 |
> purchased, I am also considering a Brother machine. I heard good stories of |
30 |
> their Linux support. I would also tend towards a network-enabled one with |
31 |
> postscript support. |
32 |
> |
33 |
|
34 |
|
35 |
I to was getting tired of the hplip thingy. It was giving me grief at |
36 |
times too. After each upgrade, I had to delete the printer and add it |
37 |
back again. Sometimes I had to do that between each print job as well. |
38 |
It seems it was always something screwy with that thing. While I would |
39 |
have bought a HP, it wasn't my first or second choice. More like close |
40 |
to the bottom with the "I'm a piece of known junk printer" brand. ;-) |
41 |
Brother would likely have been my second choice or third, depending on |
42 |
price. I've read they print nicely as well. |
43 |
|
44 |
I took the test page and put some water drops on it. I couldn't get the |
45 |
toner to come off. I was scratching the paper pretty good but almost |
46 |
anything would come off that way. In the past, I've done the same test |
47 |
on ink jet pages. They always started to run shortly after getting |
48 |
wet. I've read some photo printers don't have that problem because they |
49 |
have a different type of ink. The test I ran with this laser print tho |
50 |
made me happy. It passed my test easily. |
51 |
|
52 |
I'm just hoping I can get at least ten years out of this printer. 20 |
53 |
would make me really happy. By then, supplies may be a issue too. |
54 |
|
55 |
Dale |
56 |
|
57 |
:-) :-) |