Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Michael Scherer <a6702894@××××××××××××××.at>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: make of gentoo-sources-3.2.12 fails
Date: Thu, 17 May 2012 20:54:07
Message-Id: 20120517225151.7b269382@unet.univie.ac.at
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: make of gentoo-sources-3.2.12 fails by Michael Scherer
1 On Thu, 17 May 2012 22:13:02 +0200
2 Michael Scherer <a6702894@××××××××××××××.at> wrote:
3
4 > On Fri, 18 May 2012 01:06:02 +0700
5 > Pandu Poluan <pandu@××××××.info> wrote:
6 >
7 > > On May 17, 2012 11:19 PM, "Michael Scherer"
8 > > <a6702894@××××××××××××××.at> wrote:
9 > > >
10 > > > On Wed, 16 May 2012 07:41:32 +0700
11 > > > Pandu Poluan <pandu@××××××.info> wrote:
12 > > >
13 > > > > On May 15, 2012 7:50 AM, "Dale" <rdalek1967@×××××.com> wrote:
14 > > > > >
15 > > > > > Maybe like me, you blabber more than you think:
16 > > > > >
17 > > > > > http://archives.gentoo.org/stats/gentoo-user-per-year.xml
18 > > > > >
19 > > > > > I didn't put them in any certain order but you have fallen a
20 > > > > > bit tho. Someone put alum in your water or something?
21 > > > > >
22 > > > >
23 > > > > I blabbed that much??
24 > > > >
25 > > > > Gee... I purposefully stay away from piping up in threads
26 > > > > related to CUPS, KDE, Gnome, and other desktop-only stuff, and
27 > > > > still end up in the top 5?? o_O
28 > > > >
29 > > > > Rgds,
30 > > >
31 > > > OK, OK. May I remind you what started this thread?
32 > > > If bottom-most is really that important to you, I will
33 > > > of course comply, though with outlook express which I'm
34 > > > forced to use most of the time this is a bit tedious.
35 > > > I had no idea what a flood of angry comments my post
36 > > > on preferring top-most would start off.
37 > > >
38 > > > My original problem (see title) is as yet unsolved. Any one
39 > > > out there with an idea what might be causing this?
40 > > > I'm grateful to those 3 or 4 who tried to help, but
41 > > > by now I'm rather desperate and in the whole of internet
42 > > > pages there is nothing even coming near.
43 > > >
44 > > > bugzilla told me this wasn't a bug and go to the forums.
45 > > > So you are really my last resort.
46 > > >
47 > > > regards, michael
48 > > >
49 > >
50 > > Based on the information you've given, there can be only 2 possible
51 > > cause:
52 > >
53 > > 1. The Makefile is somehow b0rken.
54 > >
55 > > Evidence : 'ls' instead of 'ld'
56 > >
57 > > 2. Some file creation failed, causing the next step to fail.
58 > >
59 > > Please post the output of 'df -i'. I once ran out of inodes during
60 > > kernel compile, even when the filesystem (ext4) was created with
61 > > IIRC 100'000-something inodes (and still having several gigabytes
62 > > of free space).
63 > >
64 > > Nowadays, I put /usr/src and portage's tempdir on a reiserfs to
65 > > prevent running out of inodes.
66 > >
67 > > 3. Something is wrong with your filesystem.
68 > >
69 > > Especially if /usr/src is *already* on reiserfs. In this case, boot
70 > > using SystemRescueCD and do an offline fsck on the partition
71 > > containing /usr/src
72 > >
73 > > 4. Swapfile / Swap partition problems.
74 > >
75 > > Even with enough RAM, sometimes gcc just wants a swap. Post the
76 > > output of 'swapon -s' please.
77 > >
78 > > And there's also the possibility that somehow the swap gets b0rked.
79 > > Try turning off swap, rebuild the swap, and turning it back on.
80 > >
81 > > Rgds,
82 >
83 > 1) make output:
84 >
85 > CHK include/linux/version.h
86 > CHK include/generated/utsrelease.h
87 > CALL scripts/checksyscalls.sh
88 > CHK include/generated/compile.h
89 > LD init/mounts.o
90 > ls -Al -m elf_x86_64 -r -o init/mounts.o init/do_mounts.o
91 > init/do_mounts_initrd.o init/mounts.o: No such file or directory
92 > make[1]: *** [init/mounts.o] Error 1
93 > make: *** [init] Error 2
94 >
95 > There is an LD, the ls line is part of the error message.
96 >
97 > 2) df -i
98 >
99 > Filesystem Inodes IUsed IFree IUse% Mounted on
100 > rootfs 1313280 5652 1307628 1% /
101 > /dev/root 1313280 5652 1307628 1% /
102 > devtmpfs 385505 785 384720 1% /dev
103 > rc-svcdir 385724 63 385661 1% /lib64/rc/init.d
104 > /tmpfs 385724 1 385723 1% /dev/shm
105 > /dev/sda12 130560 23 130537 1% /boot
106 > /dev/sda15 3932656 363434 3569222 10% /usr
107 > /dev/sda16 6119424 275818 5843606 5% /var
108 >
109 > 3) /usr/src is ext4, and all ebuilds run without problems.
110 > If something is wrong with the file system, maybe an fsck would
111 > show it, so I'll try that.
112 >
113 > 4) swapon -s
114 >
115 > Filename Type Size
116 > Used Priority /dev/sda13
117 > partition 10482376 0 -1
118 >
119 > immediately after running make.
120 >
121 > Remaking the swap area resulted in the same line as above.
122 >
123 > But without doubt you are right that mounts.o is not built, for
124 > whatever reason. The build command
125 >
126 > init/.do_mounts.o.cmd:cmd_init/do_mounts.o := gcc
127 > -Wp,-MD,init/.do_mounts.o.d -nostdinc
128 > -isystem /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/4.5.3/include
129 > -I/usr/src/linux-3.2.12-gentoo/arch/x86/include
130 > -Iarch/x86/include/generated -Iinclude
131 > -include /usr/src/linux-3.2.12-gentoo/include/linux/kconfig.h
132 > -D__KERNEL__ -Wall -Wundef -Wstrict-prototypes -Wno-trigraphs
133 > -fno-strict-aliasing -fno-common -Werror-implicit-function-declaration
134 > -Wno-format-security -fno-delete-null-pointer-checks -O2 -m64
135 > -march=k8 -mno-red-zone -mcmodel=kernel -funit-at-a-time
136 > -maccumulate-outgoing-args -fstack-protector -DCONFIG_AS_CFI=1
137 > -DCONFIG_AS_CFI_SIGNAL_FRAME=1 -DCONFIG_AS_CFI_SECTIONS=1
138 > -DCONFIG_AS_FXSAVEQ=1 -pipe -Wno-sign-compare
139 > -fno-asynchronous-unwind-tables -mno-sse -mno-mmx -mno-sse2 -mno-3dnow
140 > -Wframe-larger-than=2048 -fno-omit-frame-pointer
141 > -fno-optimize-sibling-calls -fno-inline-functions-called-once
142 > -Wdeclaration-after-statement -Wno-pointer-sign -fno-strict-overflow
143 > -fconserve-stack -DCC_HAVE_ASM_GOTO -D"KBUILD_STR(s)=\#s"
144 > -D"KBUILD_BASENAME=KBUILD_STR(do_mounts)"
145 > -D"KBUILD_MODNAME=KBUILD_STR(mounts)" -c -o init/do_mounts.o
146 > init/do_mounts.c
147 >
148 > contains a directive to build mounts.o, see second last line, but
149 > it for some reason this is ignored.
150 > Maybe there is a flaw in that command, only I can't find it.
151 >
152 > regards, michael
153 >
154 >
155
156 And this is the makefile for mounts.o:
157
158 #
159 # Makefile for the linux kernel.
160 #
161
162 obj-y := main.o version.o mounts.o
163 ifneq ($(CONFIG_BLK_DEV_INITRD),y)
164 obj-y += noinitramfs.o
165 else
166 obj-$(CONFIG_BLK_DEV_INITRD) += initramfs.o
167 endif
168 obj-$(CONFIG_GENERIC_CALIBRATE_DELAY) += calibrate.o
169
170 mounts-y := do_mounts.o
171 mounts-$(CONFIG_BLK_DEV_RAM) += do_mounts_rd.o
172 mounts-$(CONFIG_BLK_DEV_INITRD) += do_mounts_initrd.o
173 mounts-$(CONFIG_BLK_DEV_MD) += do_mounts_md.o
174
175 # dependencies on generated files need to be listed explicitly
176 $(obj)/version.o: include/generated/compile.h
177
178 # compile.h changes depending on hostname, generation number, etc,
179 # so we regenerate it always.
180 # mkcompile_h will make sure to only update the
181 # actual file if its content has changed.
182
183 chk_compile.h = :
184 quiet_chk_compile.h = echo ' CHK $@'
185 silent_chk_compile.h = :
186 include/generated/compile.h: FORCE
187 @$($(quiet)chk_compile.h)
188 $(Q)$(CONFIG_SHELL) $(srctree)/scripts/mkcompile_h $@ \
189 "$(UTS_MACHINE)" "$(CONFIG_SMP)" "$(CONFIG_PREEMPT)" "$(CC)
190 $(KBUILD_CFLAGS)"
191
192 Seems to be OK, but then I don't know what to make of the last part
193 starting with "# compile.h changes..."
194 Maybe something wrong here.
195
196 regards, michael