| 1 |
Thanks for the Palemoon recommendation. I emerged it yesterday and I am |
| 2 |
already very happy with it. I too will probably not use Firefox anymore. |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
~Andy |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
On 18 Oct 2016 21:59, "Ian Zimmerman" <itz@×××××××.net> wrote: |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
On 2016-10-16 10:34, Martin Vaeth wrote: |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
> My recommendation: Use palemoon (from the palemoon overlay) |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
Oh man! THANK YOU! pale moon is the best thing in my digital life since |
| 13 |
gentoo :-) I can only wonder why it is not more widely known or used by |
| 14 |
hackers? |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
There seems to be a little glitch in the packaging: when I emerge |
| 17 |
pale moon first (before unmerging firefox and company), pale moon ends up |
| 18 |
linked against shared libraries from the nss and nspr packages (in |
| 19 |
/usr/lib64), instead of the bundled ones in /usr/lib64/palemoon. |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
Unmerging firefox first and then --depcleaning works around it. |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
-- |
| 24 |
Please *no* private Cc: on mailing lists and newsgroups |
| 25 |
Personal signed mail: please _encrypt_ and sign |
| 26 |
Don't clear-text sign: http://cr.yp.to/smtp/8bitmime.html |
Archives