| 1 |
I share this opinion. |
| 2 |
The message says - even if the error was corrected - that there's |
| 3 |
something dramatically wrong with your - i suppose - CPU. |
| 4 |
"Corrected error" might imply, that some low-level feature got disabled |
| 5 |
in order to prevent furher errors. |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
Does this error appear only once at early boot or frequently? |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
Regards, |
| 10 |
-- |
| 11 |
Ralf |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
On 09/23/13 22:07, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote: |
| 14 |
> Am 23.09.2013 20:59, schrieb Paul Hartman: |
| 15 |
>> On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 1:45 PM, Grant <emailgrant@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 16 |
>>> Can anyone tell me how to decipher this which has appeared in dmesg? |
| 17 |
>>> Google wasn't very helpful. |
| 18 |
>>> |
| 19 |
>>> [Hardware Error]: MC1 Error: Copyback Parity/Victim error. |
| 20 |
>>> [Hardware Error]: Error Status: Corrected error, no action required. |
| 21 |
>>> [Hardware Error]: CPU:3 (10:2:3) MC1_STATUS[-|CE|-|-|-]: 0x9000000000000171 |
| 22 |
>>> [Hardware Error]: cache level: L1, tx: INSN, mem-tx: EV |
| 23 |
>> Looks like machine check error, it detected an error in the L1 cache |
| 24 |
>> on your CPU. |
| 25 |
>> |
| 26 |
>> Since it says "Corrected error, no action required" I would not worry |
| 27 |
>> about it. If that makes you feel any better. :) |
| 28 |
>> |
| 29 |
>> |
| 30 |
> since those errors are rare, I would worry about it. |
| 31 |
> |
Archives