1 |
On Sun, Oct 19, 2008 at 11:48 AM, Philip Webb <purslow@××××××××.net> wrote: |
2 |
> 081019 Grant Edwards wrote: |
3 |
>> On 2008-10-19, Alan McKinnon <alan.mckinnon@×××××.com> wrote: |
4 |
>>> On Sunday 19 October 2008 07:25:28 Philip Webb wrote: |
5 |
>>>> OO 3.0.0 compiled successfully in 2 h 29 m on this Core2 Duo machine, |
6 |
>>>> but needed 5,3 GB temporary disk space (ok here, but others beware). |
7 |
>>> The first time I build OOo (on a 686 amd) it took 12 hours. |
8 |
>>> Now I get similar to you - 2h14 |
9 |
>> On some of my machines it still takes 12+ hours. |
10 |
> |
11 |
> On my back-up machine (AMD 2500+ , memory 1 GB : 2003), 2.4.1 took > 5 hr . |
12 |
> My everyday box (Core 2 Duo 2650 , memory 2 GB (faster FSB) : 2007), |
13 |
> OO 2.4.1 took 2 h 14 m , so 3.0.0 is a bit more time-consuming; |
14 |
> the download is much more: 346 MB against c 200 MB |
15 |
> (that doesn't include the wretched Xulrunner: 75 MB & 15 m to compile). |
16 |
> I suspect there wb pleas for help from users who run out of disk space: |
17 |
> earlier versions needed < 3 GB , so this is a big jump, |
18 |
> esp as I have 2 GB memory (I didn't check how much it was using). |
19 |
|
20 |
On my system (Core 2 Duo E6600, overclocked to 3GHz) my OOo times were: |
21 |
|
22 |
Tue Aug 19 20:47:26 2008 >>> app-office/openoffice-2.4.1 |
23 |
merge time: 2 hours, 43 minutes and 43 seconds. |
24 |
|
25 |
Fri Oct 17 21:22:31 2008 >>> app-office/openoffice-3.0.0 |
26 |
merge time: 1 hour, 33 minutes and 40 seconds. |
27 |
|
28 |
So the 3.0.0 compile is definitely faster by a lot for me. In 2.4.1 I |
29 |
was able to use my 4 gig /dev/shm for my portage_tmpdir, but for 3.0.0 |
30 |
i had to comment out and use disk for temporary files. Maybe it could |
31 |
have been even faster. |
32 |
|
33 |
Thanks, |
34 |
Paul |