| 1 |
Andrew Savchenko <bircoph@g.o> writes: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> On Fri, 25 Dec 2015 12:40:48 -0800 walt wrote: |
| 4 |
>> On Thu, 24 Dec 2015 10:18:27 -0500 |
| 5 |
>> Alan Grimes <ALONZOTG@×××××××.net> wrote: |
| 6 |
>> |
| 7 |
>> > Hey, thanks for putting out gcc 5.3... |
| 8 |
>> > |
| 9 |
>> > Unfortunately, it fails to bootstrap on my machine. I am getting |
| 10 |
>> > differences between the stage 2 and stage 3 compilers and it's |
| 11 |
>> > dying... =( |
| 12 |
>> |
| 13 |
>> I'm waiting for 5.3.1 before I even try to install it on my main |
| 14 |
>> desktop machine. |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> There will be no 5.3.1 likely. Numeration scheme is changed from 5.x |
| 17 |
> series: what was middle version is now major, what was minor is now |
| 18 |
> middle. So 5.3 is a patch version of 5.0 the same as 4.9.3 is a |
| 19 |
> patch version of 4.9.0. |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
What do you currently get as default when you update, and can you easily |
| 22 |
go back to a previous version, or have several versions installed and |
| 23 |
switch between them? |
Archives