Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Jorge Almeida <jjalmeida@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: htop wants cgroups
Date: Thu, 04 May 2017 07:36:33
Message-Id: CAKpSnpJxT-meRWqR=NLE6zMxQ1aUk1zCEYRw2cXssscf9WWy1w@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: htop wants cgroups by Daniel Campbell
1 On Wed, May 3, 2017 at 3:11 PM, Daniel Campbell <zlg@g.o> wrote:
2 > On 05/01/2017 08:01 AM, Jorge Almeida wrote:
3 >> On Mon, May 1, 2017 at 2:46 PM, Rich Freeman <rich0@g.o> wrote:
4 >>> On Sun, Apr 30, 2017 at 4:17 PM, Kai Krakow <hurikhan77@×××××.com> wrote:
5 >>>> Am Sun, 30 Apr 2017 10:33:05 -0700
6 >>>> schrieb Jorge Almeida <jjalmeida@×××××.com>:
7
8
9
10 >>
11 > cgroups are not being pushed in this case. Portage threw up a warning,
12 > letting you know that some features of htop may not be available without
13 > the CONFIG_CGROUPS flag on in the kernel. htop should work to your
14 > liking as it is right now. Go try it out!
15
16 The point is that a warning should be informative, not ominous. Maybe
17 it comes from some kind of template, as Marc suggests...
18 Gentoo users like to understand their systems, even those of us who
19 are not developer-quality. Saying "enable this, otherwise you're
20 WRONG, and we know what's best for you" is not helpful.
21 >
22 > I'm having a little trouble understanding why this particular package
23
24 Because that's the package where I found this kind of message,
25 otherwise there's nothing special about it.
26
27
28 >
29 > I've not dabbled in cgroups but they seem very useful to those who need
30 > to manage processes in ways the kernel itself can enforce. Cgroups
31 > merely help htop do its job.
32 > --
33 Indeed, _to those who need_
34
35 Regards
36
37 Jorge Almeida

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-user] Re: htop wants cgroups Alan McKinnon <alan.mckinnon@×××××.com>