1 |
Hi - if you want to be able to send encrypted email from a linux machine |
2 |
that a person using a windows machine can de-crypt and read securely, the |
3 |
simplest way is to use the Gpg4win (for the windows machine) which |
4 |
incorporates Claws Mail (a port of a linux email client which is also |
5 |
available on Gentoo). Claws mail is in Portage. So at the simplest level, if |
6 |
you install the Claws email on your linux box, along with a pgp encryption |
7 |
tool (I think it's called Gpg, not 100% sure what the Portage package is, |
8 |
but any pgp encryption tool will probably work, it may already be built in |
9 |
to Claws), then advise your windows recipients to install Gpg4win (google |
10 |
it) which is a windows package which includes Claws mail, you will be able |
11 |
to exchange encrypted emails securely between linux and windows recipients. |
12 |
On the windows machine, the Gpg4win package will encrypt & decrypt email, |
13 |
you will only need to find a gpg related tool for the linux machine in order |
14 |
to encrypt your emails on it before sending them. I'm not really sure what |
15 |
gpg uses, it may well use pgp encryption which is standard and there will be |
16 |
a tool in Portage which can encrypt and decrypt email using pgp (or at least |
17 |
one to encrypt and decrypt any file which can then be forwarded by email). |
18 |
|
19 |
TBH - the encryption side of it is really OS independent, but using Gpg4win |
20 |
on windows and any linux email client which supports pgp encryption / |
21 |
signing should give you what you are looking for (Gpg=Gnu Privacy Guard). |
22 |
You will just need to double check that whatever you use on the linux side, |
23 |
is compatible with Gpg. |
24 |
|
25 |
|
26 |
On 27 March 2011 03:03, James <wireless@×××××××××××.com> wrote: |
27 |
|
28 |
> Sebastian Beßler <sebastian <at> darkmetatron.de> writes: |
29 |
> |
30 |
> |
31 |
> > Mail encryption is, as far as I know, something that works on the |
32 |
> > client-side only. The mail server doesn't see the encryption, encrypted |
33 |
> > mails contain only text, just like every other mail. |
34 |
> > |
35 |
> |
36 |
> OK let's ignore the mail server portion. Your basically implying |
37 |
> that encrypted mail handling from the server, does not matter if |
38 |
> it's an exchange server, or *nix, like postfix.... |
39 |
> |
40 |
> As an example. |
41 |
> Look at the situation where a person is using only MS technology |
42 |
> and has no access to support(input) on their client software nor the |
43 |
> MS exchange server (big corp for example that assumes the world |
44 |
> only uses MS software). Maybe they can make a few setting changes |
45 |
> only in Outlook to get encryption working between a MS (Outlook) |
46 |
> system and my Gentoo system using pgp and thunderbird? |
47 |
> |
48 |
> |
49 |
> > If may answer has nothing to do with your problem, please give me more |
50 |
> > information what you have in mind. |
51 |
> |
52 |
> I do not have a problem. I have assumed that encrypted mail between |
53 |
> a given client software on a gentoo system, will not work with windows. |
54 |
> Is this assumption incorrect? |
55 |
> |
56 |
> Or it's just install whatever I want (mail client on gentoo) and it will |
57 |
> auto-magically exchange encrypted mail with outlook on a windows machine, |
58 |
> behind a MS Exchange server, regardless of what the MS admins |
59 |
> do on their side? |
60 |
> |
61 |
> I assumed that is not that easy (my default experience with MS), |
62 |
> and things have to be coordinated, like most MS issues, to be |
63 |
> able to exchange encrypted mail between a gentoo and MS workstation.... |
64 |
> |
65 |
> Nothing to it, or massive issues on the MS side? Obviously, |
66 |
> making changes on the gentoo workstation client, is easy.... |
67 |
> What I would really like is to be able to exchange encrypted mail |
68 |
> with any MS user. That, I'm sure with entail pointing them to |
69 |
> documents on how to set up the software on the MS (outlook) side. |
70 |
> Links for MS help? |
71 |
> |
72 |
> ??? |
73 |
> A general discussion at this point, not a specific solution. |
74 |
> My googling only reveals dated discussions along these lines |
75 |
> or information that is not useful. |
76 |
> |
77 |
> James |
78 |
> |
79 |
> |
80 |
> |
81 |
> |
82 |
> |
83 |
> |