| 1 |
On Wed, 03 Jun 2009 06:21:10 +0100, Graham Murray wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> Is there any way to improve the granularity in the merge function of |
| 4 |
> dispatch-conf, or make it more intelligent? |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> The particular situation where it gives me problems is in configuration |
| 7 |
> files where the value of an option has been manually changed following |
| 8 |
> initial installation, then on an upgrade a new option is added close to |
| 9 |
> the one previously changed. In this situation, dispatch-conf almost |
| 10 |
> invariably wants to reset the changed option line back to its default. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
I switched from dispatch-conf to conf-update a while ago and much prefer |
| 13 |
it. The merging is more flexible and rarely has problems as you describe. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
-- |
| 17 |
Neil Bothwick |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
Age and treachery will always overcome youth and skill. |
Archives