| 1 |
On 08/04/2018 09:52 AM, Konstantinos Agouros wrote: |
| 2 |
> Hi, |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> I have a Ryzen system running, so I used 4.16 as a few features are only |
| 5 |
> available there. Using ~amd64 for newer versions. Why is non ~ stuck with 4.14 |
| 6 |
> now? |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> As 4.16 is already removed from gentoo-sources I am kind of stuck with a |
| 9 |
> non existing package. |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> Konstantin |
| 12 |
I'm not absolutely certain, but I vaguely remember a decision for |
| 13 |
gentoo-sources regarding which would be marked stable. It might be that |
| 14 |
only LTS kernels will ever get marked stable. I think it was because |
| 15 |
the non-LTS releases were just too fast and frequent to allow the |
| 16 |
stabilization process to work well. It isn't an actual comment on |
| 17 |
stability, but a result of work-flow. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
Jack |
Archives