| 1 |
On 07.05.2015 13:21, R0b0t1 wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> Unfortunately I don't think this produces VM interfaces that are |
| 4 |
> visible outside of the subnet. I made some live changes a while ago |
| 5 |
> (and need to figure out what they were - probably routing stuff). In |
| 6 |
> any case, you should be able to create the tap devices and bridge them |
| 7 |
> without losing connectivity. From there you can get the guests visible |
| 8 |
> from the outside. |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
thanks! |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
but ... I got it working with macvtap today ;-) |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
To me this looks more elegant and efficient anyway ... I will read a bit |
| 15 |
more about that when things calm down here. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
In the current mode "VEPA" the host itself can't reach the VM ... that |
| 18 |
does not matter in that setup ... but it would matter for me if I set up |
| 19 |
my local VMs that way (but I have a bridge here locally so that does not |
| 20 |
matter) |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
busy days, much to learn ... ;-) |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
Thanks so far, Stefan |
Archives