1 |
>> Is there a |
2 |
>> filesystem that will make that unnecessary and exhibit better |
3 |
>> reliability than NTFS? |
4 |
> |
5 |
> Yes, FAT. It works and works well. |
6 |
> Or exFAT which is Microsoft's solution to the problem of very large |
7 |
> files on FAT. |
8 |
|
9 |
|
10 |
FAT32 won't work for me since I need to use files larger than 4GB. I |
11 |
know it's beta software but should exfat be more reliable than ntfs? |
12 |
|
13 |
|
14 |
> Which NTFS system are you using? |
15 |
> |
16 |
> ntfs kernel module? It's quite dodgy and unsafe with writes |
17 |
> ntfs-ng on fuse? I find that one quite solid |
18 |
|
19 |
|
20 |
I'm using ntfs-ng as opposed to the kernel option(s). |
21 |
|
22 |
- Grant |