1 |
On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 3:10 PM, Mark Knecht <markknecht@×××××.com> wrote: |
2 |
> On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 6:05 AM, Damian <damian.only@×××××.com> wrote: |
3 |
>> On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 2:02 PM, Mark Knecht <markknecht@×××××.com> wrote: |
4 |
>>> On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 12:28 AM, Damian <damian.only@×××××.com> wrote: |
5 |
>>>> While ago I reported a bug regarding gvfs: |
6 |
>>>> https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=302196 |
7 |
>>>> |
8 |
>>>> It's been unresolved for quite a long time now, so I was wondering if |
9 |
>>>> somebody could give me a hint on how to solve this problem. |
10 |
>>>> |
11 |
>>>> Best, |
12 |
>>>> Damian. |
13 |
>>>> |
14 |
>>>> |
15 |
>>> |
16 |
>>> ?? |
17 |
>>> |
18 |
>>> revdep-rebuild -ip |
19 |
>> I already tried (reconcilio actually), and didn't solve the problem: |
20 |
>> it tries to rebuild gvfs, failing miserably again. |
21 |
>> |
22 |
> |
23 |
> I saw that in the bug report. If you want to keep going down the path |
24 |
> of what didn't work then do nothing. Potentially revdep-rebuild finds |
25 |
> something else. |
26 |
> |
27 |
> You need to post some results. I've seen gvfs fail due to flag |
28 |
> settings. How would anyone here make a reasoned response with so |
29 |
> little data? |
30 |
Actually the flag plays no role. Since I compiled the package again |
31 |
with the original flags and I got the same results. I honestly don't |
32 |
know which (other) relevant data I can provide. |
33 |
|
34 |
I didn't intend to make anybody upset with my email, or with the |
35 |
mention to the word paludis. |