Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Peter Humphrey <peter@××××××××××××××.org>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] dlna & Gentoo
Date: Sun, 31 Jan 2010 02:31:57
Message-Id: 201001310231.22977.peter@humphrey.ukfsn.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] dlna & Gentoo by Iain Buchanan
1 On Saturday 30 January 2010 06:04:58 Iain Buchanan wrote:
2 > On Fri, 2010-01-29 at 15:21 +0000, Peter Humphrey wrote:
3 > > On Friday 29 January 2010 14:12:10 Iain Buchanan wrote:
4 > > > what contract?
5 > >
6 > > I don't know how it is where you are,
7 >
8 > Australia :)
9
10 Ah! I'd forgotten, but I still wouldn't have known how the law works there.
11
12 > > but in the UK, as I understand it,
13 > > every sale is deemed to embody an implied contract* between buyer and
14 > > seller. Either party is always free to specify whatever conditions he
15 > > likes prior to the sale, and the other can accept them or not.
16 >
17 > That sounds like a good law!
18
19 I don't think it was enacted specifically - it's one of a considerable body
20 of common law that did as Topsy did, but over several centuries: it just
21 growed.
22
23 > Here you could take a product back if the salesperson had wrongly promised
24 > it provided some feature, but the further the feature strays from the
25 > average users requirements the less likely you are to get such a promise.
26
27 That's reasonable, but what's to stop you from calling a supervisor over and
28 making sure they both understood your one simple requirement? You would then
29 be able to prove, later, that they'd broken the agreement by supplying
30 unsuitable goods. Maybe your system isn't so different from ours after all.
31
32 > I was just surprised that your wording sounded like it's common practise
33 > to ask for slightly different terms before the sale, and have them
34 > accepted.
35
36 It isn't common practice, because of course most people just go with the
37 flow, but I'm thinking of the case when one particular detail is especially
38 important to you, sufficiently to warrant special measures, as it is here.
39 There's been quite a lot of legal exploration of the possibilities over the
40 years, and what I said is, I believe (as a non-specialist), the current,
41 firmly established state of the art.
42
43 > What happens when businesses just tell their salespeople not to agree to
44 > extra terms? Surely there's still enough demand in the general
45 > simple-requirement public to keep up sales?
46
47 In that case you take your custom elsewhere, and let them know why. And of
48 course you'd expect an unusual demand such as this to be sent up the line to
49 someone who could make a decision.
50
51 --
52 Rgds
53 Peter.
54
55 PS. (OT) This reminds me of an experience my father had in Nottingham in the
56 50s. He was in a branch of a national chain of pharmacists' on a Saturday
57 afternoon; he'd chosen his product and was waiting at the till for a girl to
58 take his money (they were always girls on a Saturday). Several of them were
59 in a corner, gossiping and doing their nails. Eventually he announced loudly
60 "If I'm not served soon I'll take my custom elsewhere!" They looked up,
61 blankly, and went back to their nails. He took his custom elsewhere and
62 forever after called Nottingham a "one-horse town". It didn't do his blood
63 pressure any good either.