1 |
Well, emerge it again :). You can have two postgresql-servers in different |
2 |
slots. |
3 |
|
4 |
2014-11-10 16:21 GMT+05:00 <covici@××××××××××.com>: |
5 |
|
6 |
> However, when I emerge beta3, beta2 is gone, so this is my problem. |
7 |
> |
8 |
> |
9 |
> Vladimir Romanov <blueboar2@×××××.com> wrote: |
10 |
> |
11 |
> > Yes. You emerge both beta2 and beta3, then run pg_upgrade for beta3, |
12 |
> > provide BOTH binaries to it, it converts the base. Then you can delete |
13 |
> > beta2. |
14 |
> > |
15 |
> > 2014-11-10 16:04 GMT+05:00 <covici@××××××××××.com>: |
16 |
> > |
17 |
> > > Hi. I have a puzzle regarding upgrading postgresql. In my recent |
18 |
> world |
19 |
> > > update I went from 9.4_beta2 to beta3, but when I tried to start the |
20 |
> > > server, it complained that the databases were written with a different |
21 |
> > > "catalog version" -- whatever that is, and the pg_upgrade tool requires |
22 |
> > > both old and new binaries to actually upgrade the database. So as a |
23 |
> > > temporary measure, I went back to beta2 and things worked again. So |
24 |
> > > what the heck are you supposed to do here, I like pg, but this is very |
25 |
> > > strange to me. |
26 |
> > > |
27 |
> > > Thanks in advance for any suggestions. |
28 |
> > > |
29 |
> > > -- |
30 |
> > > Your life is like a penny. You're going to lose it. The question is: |
31 |
> > > How do |
32 |
> > > you spend it? |
33 |
> > > |
34 |
> > > John Covici |
35 |
> > > covici@××××××××××.com |
36 |
> > > |
37 |
> > > |
38 |
> > |
39 |
> > ---------------------------------------------------- |
40 |
> > Alternatives: |
41 |
> > |
42 |
> > ---------------------------------------------------- |
43 |
> |
44 |
> -- |
45 |
> Your life is like a penny. You're going to lose it. The question is: |
46 |
> How do |
47 |
> you spend it? |
48 |
> |
49 |
> John Covici |
50 |
> covici@××××××××××.com |
51 |
> |
52 |
> |