| 1 |
Le Sun, 26 Nov 2006 13:41:56 +0100, |
| 2 |
Harm Geerts a écrit : |
| 3 |
> This only forces portage to retrieve *all* of portage's metadata from |
| 4 |
> the server *again*. |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
Yes. |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
> If the corruption is local, a normal rsync will fix this. |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
Not necessarily. See bug #145482. |
| 11 |
Synchronization again and again (on several days) didn't resolve this. |
| 12 |
I removed the entire cache, as suggested, and it magically worked. |
| 13 |
And I discovered later that the filesystem was corrupted. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
> If the corruption is on the upstream rsync mirror, you will retrieve |
| 16 |
> the same corrupt metadata again. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
I've never seen that case. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
> removing the metadata from the portage tree only results in more data |
| 21 |
> transfers from the rsync mirror. |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
Yes, but obviously, you must not do it every day. |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
@Mick : I suggest that you run a fsck on your filesystem. |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
-- |
| 28 |
gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |
Archives