Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Paul Hartman <paul.hartman+gentoo@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Why does emerge want to downgrade firefox/xul-runner?
Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2011 03:59:39
Message-Id: 58965d8a0908251419l312f1887xd16e6501cd05e87b@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: [gentoo-user] Why does emerge want to downgrade firefox/xul-runner? by Grant Edwards
1 On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 4:04 PM, Grant Edwards<grant.b.edwards@×××××.com> wrote:
2 > Were firefox 3.5.2 and xulrunner 1.9.1.2 marked as stable last
3 > week and then changed back to unstable this week?
4
5 I think so, yes. If you read the Changelog file, it shows this:
6
7 21 Aug 2009; Christian Faulhammer <fauli@g.o>
8 mozilla-firefox-3.5.2-r1.ebuild:
9 revert all stable keywords
10
11 20 Aug 2009; Jeroen Roovers <jer@g.o>
12 mozilla-firefox-3.5.2-r1.ebuild:
13 Stable for HPPA (bug #280393).
14
15 20 Aug 2009; Christian Faulhammer <fauli@g.o>
16 mozilla-firefox-3.5.2-r1.ebuild:
17 stable x86, security bug 280393

Replies

Subject Author
[gentoo-user] Re: Why does emerge want to downgrade firefox/xul-runner? Grant Edwards <grant.b.edwards@×××××.com>