| 1 |
On 31 July 2011, at 13:15, Albert Hopkins wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> Yeah, sorry about that. I think my understanding was clouded by all the |
| 4 |
> peripheral discussion regarding stable/unstable and different versions |
| 5 |
> of portage. That and the fact that I had just gotten out of bed when I |
| 6 |
> read it :P |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> They OP could have simply said "Hey, when I synced I saw a message that |
| 9 |
> I there was a new portage available, but when I run 'emerge -up world' |
| 10 |
> or 'emerge -up system' it doesn't show the updated package." |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
Yeah, I specifically wanted to stave off suggestions of "you should unmask the ~86 versions of portage, anyway", as I think I saw that view aired fairly robustly in another thread recently and it's really not for me. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
I was also quite conscious of this because this seems to be a new change for me, but most of the users of this list seem to use ~x86 / ~amd64, so will presumably have encountered this change months ago. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
I googled, but I didn't find this change obviously documented anywhere. I probably used the wrong keywords, but I'd love to know where this *is* documented. It seems like the kinda thing that would be announcing. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
Stroller. |
Archives