1 |
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 6:26 PM, Mark Knecht <markknecht@×××××.com> wrote: |
2 |
> On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 3:05 PM, Mike Edenfield <kutulu@××××××.org> wrote: |
3 |
>> On Thursday, September 15, 2011 11:16:03 PM Joost Roeleveld wrote: |
4 |
>>> On Thursday, September 15, 2011 04:42:23 PM Mike Edenfield wrote: |
5 |
>> |
6 |
>>> > I would estimate that the vast, vast, vast majority of users are those |
7 |
>>> > such as myslelf, who have no opinion whatsoever, and either will not be |
8 |
>>> > affected at all by these changes (because they don't separate / and |
9 |
>>> > /usr), or will simply apply the proposed initramfs solution and move |
10 |
>>> > on. |
11 |
>>> |
12 |
>>> You also don't have /var (or /var/log) seperated? Or any of the other parts |
13 |
>>> of the filesystem that might be required by udev-rules? |
14 |
>> |
15 |
>> Speaking solely for myself, no. Years ago I routinely split /, /usr, and /var |
16 |
>> when setting up my FreeBSD systems, and found that it only ever caused |
17 |
>> problems when I could not get /usr or /var mounted when I needed them. |
18 |
>> |
19 |
>> At least since I switched to Gentoo, I've simply set up one partition with |
20 |
>> everything on it, and kept regular backups in case of failure. |
21 |
>> |
22 |
>> I clearly recognize that there are valid reasons to split your partitions, I |
23 |
>> have just never found any of them applicable to my situations. |
24 |
>> |
25 |
>> --Mike |
26 |
> |
27 |
> My first response to this 300+ post thread, and only to say that in |
28 |
> something like 15 years of playing with & using Linux I've never split |
29 |
> /usr & no longer split /var. I also don't use LVM or anything fancy |
30 |
> like that. I just keep backups and use them if there's a failure. Life |
31 |
> is pretty simple. |
32 |
> |
33 |
> My suspicion is that by far most casual desktop users of Linux, Gentoo |
34 |
> based or not, run pretty much this way and will be unaffected by this |
35 |
> whole change and as such have no reason to post. |
36 |
|
37 |
Ubuntu recommends /, /home and swap [1]. Fedora recommends /, /boot |
38 |
and swap [2]. OpenSUSE has several sets, but the "simple" and "dual |
39 |
booting" recommends /, /boot, /home and swap [3]. Debian says [4]: |
40 |
|
41 |
"For new users, personal Debian boxes, home systems, and other |
42 |
single-user setups, a single / partition (plus swap) is probably the |
43 |
easiest, simplest way to go. However, this might not be such a good |
44 |
idea when you have lots of disk capacity, e.g., 20GB or so. Ext2 |
45 |
partitions tend to perform poorly on file system integrity checking |
46 |
when they are larger than 6GB or so. |
47 |
|
48 |
For multi-user systems or systems with lots of disk, it's best to put |
49 |
/usr, /var, /tmp, and /home each on their own partitions separate from |
50 |
the / partition." |
51 |
|
52 |
Interestingly, the Gentoo handbook [5] recommends /, /boot and swap. |
53 |
Damn, I haven't installed Gentoo in a long time, I hadn't looked at |
54 |
the handbook in years. |
55 |
|
56 |
Anyway, Debian is the only "big" distro recommending separated /usr, |
57 |
and then only for multiuser setups. It's really years since I've |
58 |
looked at the recommended partition schemes: when I started using |
59 |
Linux, a separated /home was almost a must. And we had tiny hard |
60 |
drives then. Now get out of my lawn. |
61 |
|
62 |
Regards. |
63 |
|
64 |
[1] http://www.easy-ubuntu-linux.com/ubuntu-installation-606-7.html |
65 |
[2] http://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora/13/html/Installation_Guide/s2-diskpartrecommend-x86.html |
66 |
[3] http://en.opensuse.org/SDB:Partitioning |
67 |
[4] http://www.debian.org/releases/woody/i386/ch-partitioning.en.html |
68 |
[5] http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/handbook/handbook-amd64.xml?full=1 |
69 |
-- |
70 |
Canek Peláez Valdés |
71 |
Posgrado en Ciencia e Ingeniería de la Computación |
72 |
Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México |