Archives
Archives
| From: | pk <peterk2@××××××××.se> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-user@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-user] [OT] Re: Do we have to build gcc with fortran now? | ||
| Date: | Fri, 24 Jun 2011 08:56:23 | ||
| Message-Id: | 4E045060.9020706@coolmail.se | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-user] [OT] Re: Do we have to build gcc with fortran now? by Alan McKinnon |
||
| 1 | On 2011-06-23 21:43, Alan McKinnon wrote: |
| 2 | |
| 3 | > Of course there's a place for Cobol, a classic one is in the bank my |
| 4 | > gf does data warehousing at. |
| 5 | > |
| 6 | > There's not a single soul in the entire bank that is willing to sign |
| 7 | > off on a project to replace the Cobol that has run |
| 8 | > justfinethanksverymuch for 25+ years |
| 9 | |
| 10 | To Neil: |
| 11 | What Alan said... :-D |
| 12 | |
| 13 | Best regards |
| 14 | |
| 15 | Peter K |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-user] [OT] Re: Do we have to build gcc with fortran now? | Neil Bothwick <neil@××××××××××.uk> |