1 |
Neil Bothwick <neil@××××××××××.uk> [10-04-02 14:08]: |
2 |
> On Fri, 2 Apr 2010 13:04:53 +0200, meino.cramer@×××.de wrote: |
3 |
> |
4 |
> > only to be sure to have understood everything correctly: |
5 |
> > Suggestion is to create for example one root partition and a swap |
6 |
> > partion. And I will create on big "rest of the disk"-partition. |
7 |
> > The last one will be subdivided with LVM into portions as needed. |
8 |
> |
9 |
> Yes. |
10 |
> |
11 |
> > Since the last big partition is big due to physical reasons (not for |
12 |
> > logical one): What will happen, if -- for example -- one portion will |
13 |
> > be not unmounted cleanly and while booting/checking fails to recover? |
14 |
> > Are all others damaged/lost? |
15 |
> |
16 |
> No, because the failure you describe is at the filesystem level. Even the |
17 |
> volume containing that filesystem will retain integrity, only the |
18 |
> filesystem itself will be corrupted. As you have left free space on the |
19 |
> volume group, you can just create a new volume, format it and copy over |
20 |
> everything you can recover from the broken filesystem before deleting it. |
21 |
> |
22 |
|
23 |
Hi Neil, |
24 |
|
25 |
yes, sounds good, very good. |
26 |
Last question: How heavy is the performance impact of such a setup ? |
27 |
|
28 |
|
29 |
|
30 |
|
31 |
|
32 |
-- |
33 |
Please don't send me any Word- or Powerpoint-Attachments |
34 |
unless it's absolutely neccessary. - Send simply Text. |
35 |
See http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html |
36 |
In a world without fences and walls nobody needs gates and windows. |