| 1 |
On 08/17/2010 10:58 AM, Nganon wrote: |
| 2 |
> |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> On 17 August 2010 19:49, Andy Wilkinson <drukargin@×××××.com |
| 5 |
> <mailto:drukargin@×××××.com>> wrote: |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> Thanks for the info. That doesn't entirely answer my question, |
| 8 |
> though... shouldn't chromium's bundled ffmpeg have h264 support? |
| 9 |
> Google's youtube.com/html5 <http://youtube.com/html5> page |
| 10 |
> suggests that Chrome (and thus chromium?) supports h264. Is this |
| 11 |
> a licensing issue going to the open source build that I've not |
| 12 |
> heard of yet? |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> Yes bundled ffmpeg should have h264 support but I think it as broken |
| 16 |
> with |
| 17 |
> a patch for ubuntu. |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
> Did you read the bug report on crbug? It is reported for 479 and marked |
| 20 |
> as *fixed* in the trunk as of Aug 9th. I didnt read the release note |
| 21 |
> of it but |
| 22 |
> 490 was released on 13th and is in portage since then. So..you can |
| 23 |
> either unmask it and give it a try or wait for the next release and |
| 24 |
> keep an |
| 25 |
> eye on the release notes. |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
I have tried 490, and it has the same problem: html5test.com reports no |
| 28 |
h264 support, and non-webm, html5 youtube videos don't work. |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
I'll continue trying successive builds as they're posted... maybe 490 |
| 31 |
doesn't have that commit yet? |
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
-Andy |
Archives