1 |
On Wednesday 03 March 2010 19:30:56 stosss wrote: |
2 |
> > I wonder if amarok would not be better off using the strigi/nepomuk |
3 |
> > indexing function, instead of trying to be real clever and doing it |
4 |
> > itself. |
5 |
> |
6 |
> I think Amarok uses MySQL. |
7 |
|
8 |
Amarok definitely uses MySQL, but that's the storage function, we are talking |
9 |
about the search function. |
10 |
|
11 |
It uses MySQL in the most brain-dead way anyone ever heard of, a way that no- |
12 |
one in their right mind would consider even half-way sane. |
13 |
|
14 |
It *requires* you to jump through interminable loops at build-time because it |
15 |
wants, wait for it, shared embedded libraries. I mean, wtf? That's not |
16 |
something MySQL was built to do. It's like having sex to preserve virginity |
17 |
|
18 |
Then, to top it all, the Qt db libs get used wrongly too, causing the db to |
19 |
... not work. |
20 |
|
21 |
-- |
22 |
alan dot mckinnon at gmail dot com |