Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: microcai <microcai@×××××××××××××.org>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] new machine : CPU : 22 nm vs 32 nm
Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2012 08:40:29
Message-Id: CAMgqO2wF7H781zSwj4sd-KXtVzXkoUOud7d3r26w1qt6-_uPaQ@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: [gentoo-user] new machine : CPU : 22 nm vs 32 nm by Philip Webb
1 2012/7/26 Philip Webb <purslow@××××××××.net>:
2 > I've listed what's available at the local store,
3 > which I trust to stock reliable items, tho' I wouldn't ask their advice.
4 >
5 > All the AMD's are 32 nm , while the Intel recommended by one commenter
6 > -- Core i5-3570 4-Core Socket LGA1155, 3.4 Ghz, 6MB L3 Cache, 22 nm --
7 > is 22 nm : it costs CAD 230 & they have 3 in stock,
8 > which suggests demand, but not the most popular ( 9 in stock).
9 >
10 > Isn't 22 nm going to be faster than 32 nm ?
11 >
12 > In the same price range, AMD offers Bulldozer X8 FX-8150 (125W)
13 > 8-Core Socket AM3+, 3.6 GHz, 8Mb Cache, 32 nm ( CAD 220 , 2 in stock).
14 >
15 > How do you compare cores vs nm ?
16 > How far is cache size important ( 6 vs 8 MB )?
17
18 cache size is always the most important thing. cache miss is the top
19 reason your application slows down.
20
21 >
22 > When I built my current machine 2007, the CPU cost CAD 213 ,
23 > so both look as if they're in the right ballpark.
24 >
25 > --
26 > ========================,,============================================
27 > SUPPORT ___________//___, Philip Webb
28 > ELECTRIC /] [] [] [] [] []| Cities Centre, University of Toronto
29 > TRANSIT `-O----------O---' purslowatchassdotutorontodotca
30 >
31 >

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-user] new machine : CPU : 22 nm vs 32 nm Michael Mol <mikemol@×××××.com>