| 1 |
Steven Susbauer wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Sat, 27 May 2006, Neil Bothwick wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
>> Absolutely. The GWN posting was clearly optimistic :( |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
Way too much. On the bug report, it's been announced, that the upgrade doc |
| 7 |
will be rewritten, so that people are warned. |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
> Why would an emerge -e world be required? |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
Because of "two version linkage of libstdc++". See the bug. See my posts. |
| 12 |
See Neil's post. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
> It is not required to rebuild |
| 15 |
> every package using the new gcc. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
"Re-emerge of world is suggested.". See the bug. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
> They will slowly be rebuilt when they are |
| 20 |
> upgraded. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
And until that time, you maybe have a half-working system. |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
> I have done nothing since upgrading and had not one issue. |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
Lucky you. |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
Did you re-compile qt 3 and qt 4 since then? How are your KDE programs |
| 29 |
behaving? Have you recompiled your KDE programs? |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
> Why |
| 32 |
> would I, |
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
To get a working system. |
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
> it doesn't even make sense? |
| 37 |
|
| 38 |
Well. |
| 39 |
|
| 40 |
> They are binaries, after all. |
| 41 |
|
| 42 |
They are dynamicly linked, which is the problem here. And as you've seen |
| 43 |
in the bug report, that's exactly the problem. |
| 44 |
|
| 45 |
Alexander Skwar |
| 46 |
-- |
| 47 |
If at first you do succeed, try to hide your astonishment. |
| 48 |
-- |
| 49 |
gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |
Archives