1 |
On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 2:43 PM, Mick <michaelkintzios@×××××.com> wrote: |
2 |
> |
3 |
> On Monday 21 April 2008, Mark Knecht wrote: |
4 |
> > On Mon, Apr 21, 2008 at 2:22 PM, Neil Bothwick <neil@××××××××××.uk> wrote: |
5 |
> > > On Mon, 21 Apr 2008 17:41:58 +0200, Dirk Heinrichs wrote: |
6 |
> > > > The other possible way would be to give your devices unique names, |
7 |
> > > > either via udev or by using LVM. Advantage over UUIDs: much easier to |
8 |
> > > > read. |
9 |
> > > |
10 |
> > > Or you could use filesystem labels. |
11 |
> > |
12 |
> > I've used filesystem labels for a long time and generally it works |
13 |
> > really well. Only problem I've had is my Dad's machine has a Maxtor |
14 |
> > 1-touch 1394 drive. It seems that often it doesn't get recognized by |
15 |
> > the 1394 subsystem fast enough to satisfy whatever requirements the |
16 |
> > Gentoo scripts have for the label being readable so it doesn't |
17 |
> > reliably get recognized every time. |
18 |
> |
19 |
> I have thought about using labels, but never really ventured into it (I think |
20 |
> I tried it once on a server). Can I do it retrospectively on ext2, reiserfs |
21 |
> and xfs, or is it going to erase the contents of the partition? |
22 |
> -- |
23 |
> Regards, |
24 |
> Mick |
25 |
> |
26 |
|
27 |
Yep. I use e2label. Works fine with ext2 and ext3 partitions. One |
28 |
command to read the label, another to write it. Easy. |
29 |
|
30 |
- Mark |
31 |
-- |
32 |
gentoo-user@l.g.o mailing list |