| 1 |
2009/1/15 Neil Bothwick <neil@××××××××××.uk> |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> On Fri, 16 Jan 2009 00:00:07 +0100, Geralt wrote: |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> > > You don't need to remove anything, just let portage handle the block |
| 6 |
> > > for you. Blocks marked with a b (instead of a B) can be handled by |
| 7 |
> > > recent portage releases. |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> > are you sure that his works in this case? This blocking bug was some |
| 10 |
> > time before the new Portage went stable and back then you had to |
| 11 |
> > resolve it by hand. |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> That's right, but now the new portage is stable so it is handled on |
| 14 |
> stable systems. The block was handled automatically when it first appeared |
| 15 |
> on ~arch systems. |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> -- |
| 19 |
> Neil Bothwick |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
> Is it true that cannibals don't eat clowns because they taste funny? |
| 22 |
> |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
Which version of portage do this? I am on amd64 stable and have the problem |
| 25 |
a couple of week ago, and i don/t remember any portage update,,, |
Archives