Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Bruce Hill <daddy@×××××××××××××××××××××.com>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] separate / and /usr to require initramfs 2013-11-01
Date: Sun, 29 Sep 2013 18:03:17
Message-Id: 20130929180253.GP23408@server
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] separate / and /usr to require initramfs 2013-11-01 by Tanstaafl
1 On Sun, Sep 29, 2013 at 01:24:25PM -0400, Tanstaafl wrote:
2 > >
3 > > The news item *IS* the warning.
4 >
5 > Oh for *Tanstaafl's* sake... *Tanstaafl*.
6 >
7 > If an ebuild maintainer changes something that will BREAK BOOTING on
8 > systems that violate the 'no separate /usr without an initramfs' rule,
9 > what in the *Tanstaafl* is the problem with requiring them to WARN PEOPLE?
10
11 You show the smallness of your vocabulary by using profanity. And you show the
12 shallowness of your *nix knowledge by replying with such nonesense.
13 --
14 Happy Penguin Computers >')
15 126 Fenco Drive ( \
16 Tupelo, MS 38801 ^^
17 support@×××××××××××××××××××××.com
18 662-269-2706 662-205-6424
19 http://happypenguincomputers.com/
20
21 A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
22 Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
23 A: Top-posting.
24 Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail?
25
26 Don't top-post: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Top_post#Top-posting

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-user] separate / and /usr to require initramfs 2013-11-01 Tanstaafl <tanstaafl@×××××××××××.org>