| 1 |
On Jan 30, 2012 4:52 AM, "walt" <w41ter@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 2 |
> |
| 3 |
> On 01/29/2012 11:23 AM, Alex Schuster wrote: |
| 4 |
> > Do packages fail to build? We just had a 'Graphite |
| 5 |
> > causing trouble' thread here, |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> I've read in this group that an occasional package fails when using |
| 8 |
> -j2 or higher (which you will certainly be doing) but that has nothing |
| 9 |
> to do with graphite. |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
In my case, as long as I stay -j3 or lower, everything compile well. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
> I've been using graphite for a long time with no problem whatever. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
I took the plunge when graphite went stable and production-ready in the |
| 17 |
4.5.x series. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
> Except for a rare rebuild of cloog-ppl, of course, but I already knew |
| 20 |
> how to bail myself out of that situation, and now you know too :) |
| 21 |
> |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
Let me add that my servers *feel* faster with graphite. Of course, YMMV. |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
Rgds, |
Archives