| 1 |
On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 1:51 AM, Neil Bothwick <neil@××××××××××.uk> wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Tue, 27 Mar 2012 18:47:06 -0500, Dale wrote: |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
>> > Why not post the details of it? All an initramfs is is an init script |
| 5 |
>> > and a few binaries. Extract the init script, the initramfs file is a |
| 6 |
>> > plain cpio archive, and post it here. |
| 7 |
>> |
| 8 |
>> I did post it a week or so ago in another thread. |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> The init script? I didn't see it, which thread? |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
>> Yea, I know all that. They are breaking one thing to fix something else |
| 13 |
>> so that they don't have to deal with fixing what they broke. I got that |
| 14 |
>> a long time ago. ;-) |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> I'm coming round to the point of view that the breakage predates udev by |
| 17 |
> many years. The whole idea of having four directories for binaries and |
| 18 |
> two for libraries is an inelegance that I have come to accept over the |
| 19 |
> years but only because it is "the way we have always done it" |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
http://lists.busybox.net/pipermail/busybox/2010-December/074114.html |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
Regards. |
| 24 |
-- |
| 25 |
Canek Peláez Valdés |
| 26 |
Posgrado en Ciencia e Ingeniería de la Computación |
| 27 |
Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México |
Archives