| 1 |
On Sunday 01 August 2010 17:33:20 James wrote: |
| 2 |
> James <wireless <at> tampabay.rr.com> writes: |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> Here's a dev_debate that really muddies these |
| 5 |
> baselayout waters (at least from where I sit). |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> http://www.listware.net/201007/gentoo-dev/9517-gentoo-dev |
| 8 |
> -the-future-of-sys-appsopenrc-in-gentoo.html |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> Any discussion or guidance is welcome! |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
Like you I thought of going down this path, but held back because as time |
| 13 |
passed openrc (and portage 2.2) have been masked for quite some time now. Now |
| 14 |
that I see from your link that systemd may be another alternative I will |
| 15 |
definitely wait, until something becomes stable. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
Anyway, that's just my take on this matter - for many gentoo users being on |
| 18 |
the latest baselayout is more important than what it is for me. I'm happy |
| 19 |
when my systems work with minimum interference on my behalf so when I can help |
| 20 |
it I avoid unnecessary migrations by staying on stable. |
| 21 |
-- |
| 22 |
Regards, |
| 23 |
Mick |
Archives