Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Michael Higgins <linux@×××××××.org>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Is the move perl-5.10 involved here
Date: Thu, 04 Mar 2010 18:13:09
Message-Id: 20100304101234.2d9363df@lappy.evolone.org
In Reply to: [gentoo-user] Re: Is the move perl-5.10 involved here by Harry Putnam
1 On Thu, 04 Mar 2010 10:52:30 -0600
2 Harry Putnam <reader@×××××××.com> wrote:
3
4 > >> Use of uninitialized value in subroutine entry
5 > >> at /usr/lib/perl5/5.10.1/i686-linux/DynaLoader.pm line 223. object
6 > >> version 1.609 does not match $::VERSION %_
7 > >> at /usr/lib/perl5/5.10.1/i686-linux/DynaLoader.pm line 223. BEGIN
8 > >> failed--compilation aborted
9 > >> at /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/i686-linux/DBI.pm line 263.
10 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
11 Your perl installation is broken. That is obvious. What you do to fix
12 it probably should start with perl-cleaner... FWIW my experience with
13 updating it has been fine.
14
15 Basically, why are you asking...
16
17 > So do you think its related to the update to perl-5.10?"
18
19 and
20
21 > Have you had a similar problem and `perl-cleaner' fixed it?
22
23 ... because either you ran perl-cleaner or you didn't. It does
24 something you need to do if portage manages perl, so just let it
25 work. ;-)
26
27 Just have a look a perl-cleaner itself if you are concerned.
28
29 head `which perl-cleaner`
30 #!/bin/bash
31
32
33 Cheers,
34
35 --
36 |\ /| | | ~ ~
37 | \/ | |---| `|` ?
38 | |ichael | |iggins \^ /
39 michael.higgins[at]evolone[dot]org

Replies

Subject Author
[gentoo-user] Re: Is the move perl-5.10 involved here Harry Putnam <reader@×××××××.com>